For me it'd be much too slow 
Problem With SWRC
Moderator: hife
-
S.T.O.R.M.
- Veteran
- Posts: 1926
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 1:41 pm
- Location: Heaven
Re: Problem With SWRC
Not my problem, do what you want, idc For me it'd be much too slow
For me it'd be much too slow -=INSTA-GOD=-
[00:52] ]-TX-[•Penguin{DivCom}: when storm says brb
[00:52] ]-TX-[•Penguin{DivCom}: i alt tab
[00:52] ]-TX-[•Penguin{DivCom}: and read the news.
[00:52] ]-TX-[•Penguin{DivCom}: usually can get to about page 157
[00:52] ]-TX-[•Penguin{DivCom}: before hes back
Re: Problem With SWRC
For WinXP it's really fast and good. I would not go for Vista/Win7 for sure though.
[18:30] -=TAG=-Snoop: Okay, Thank you, and sorry for interrupting your ingenious laboratory work Professor Vash.
-
S.T.O.R.M.
- Veteran
- Posts: 1926
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2007 1:41 pm
- Location: Heaven
Re: Problem With SWRC
1,7 Ghz are rly fast, ye for sure xD. Even my netbook has 2x 1,6 lol... Depends on what you want to do with it.
Btw: We're going offtopic now, I lock this topic.
Btw: We're going offtopic now, I lock this topic.
-=INSTA-GOD=-
[00:52] ]-TX-[•Penguin{DivCom}: when storm says brb
[00:52] ]-TX-[•Penguin{DivCom}: i alt tab
[00:52] ]-TX-[•Penguin{DivCom}: and read the news.
[00:52] ]-TX-[•Penguin{DivCom}: usually can get to about page 157
[00:52] ]-TX-[•Penguin{DivCom}: before hes back
Re: Problem With SWRC
Do you have any clue about the Pentium M CPU? It's really effective!S.T.O.R.M. wrote:1,7 Ghz are rly fast, ye for sure xD. Even my netbook has 2x 1,6 lol... Depends on what you want to do with it.
It was Intel's first "good CPU" without this shitty Netburst technology.
By the way: The Pentium M with 1.6 GHz is around 55% faster than the Atom with 1.6 GHz. :-)
[18:30] -=TAG=-Snoop: Okay, Thank you, and sorry for interrupting your ingenious laboratory work Professor Vash.