]-TX-[ | TeamXtreme Clan Forums

Well if you want to give him a chance it's ok for me, but then we treated in a different way the same kind of applicant. I mean:
Stewie -> apped as an unknown guy -> Denied -> apped as Stewie -> Denied & banned from TX
Scarv -> apped as Scarv -> Denied (twice in a row) -> apped as an unknown guy -> currently running his app with our approval

Even if Stewie did that thing 100 times more than Scarv, I remind that Stewie's also 3-4 years younger than him.

Whatever. Good luck.

Judge wrote:Am I the only one who doesn't like this kind of behavior? Seriously... you come here and lie about everything of yourself. It is the worst step to ever achieve your application.

+1
Well you flamed me sometimes. One time you changed the name to Scarz and insulted me. We will see if you changed...

Gl!

Sry that I couldnt answer yesterday some questions. I was by a good friend.
However... I gave Vash my word that I wont do any shit. I see this app as my last chance here and I take this app very seriously.

Edit: Judge, I hope u know now why I used another name. If u like I can it explain u better in x fire.

I hope the most of inconsistencies are clarified and when not I'm for all open in xfire.

And now I will still give my best and will show my best side,

... your ScarV.

I will post this screenshots separate because I like my text above as an own significant text without any edits ( like this ss now ). However, new ss

Pacio wrote:Even if Stewie did that thing 100 times more than Scarv, I remind that Stewie's also 3-4 years younger than him.

Yeah so what? Age is no excuse !

I'm a bit "disapointed" you tried to hide us the truth against so obvious evidences. (And yeah you could at least have tried to translate in english a summary of your nice text).


However I never had any personal problem with you so the only thing I can tell you is "good luck ". Don't ruin this chance though; stay calm in every situation !

We had a 1in1, he win 15/6 but i sucked a lot.

GG

Thank u DC-17.

Dc-17 wrote:

Pacio wrote:Even if Stewie did that thing 100 times more than Scarv, I remind that Stewie's also 3-4 years younger than him.

Yeah so what? Age is no excuse !

I'm a bit "disapointed" you tried to hide us the truth against so obvious evidences. (And yeah you could at least have tried to translate in english a summary of your nice text).


However I never had any personal problem with you so the only thing I can tell you is "good luck ". Don't ruin this chance though; stay calm in every situation !

I tried to translate it for ya hoped you guys at least saw that ^^

I understood the text that's not the problem.


Also yes I didn't thank you for the translation but it's really nice from you. But what I said is that Scarv should have tried to sum it up a little bit, instead of you.


Anyway let's move on.

He doesnt deserve a chance in my opinion.

Dc-17 wrote:

Pacio wrote:Even if Stewie did that thing 100 times more than Scarv, I remind that Stewie's also 3-4 years younger than him.

Yeah so what? Age is no excuse !

TeamXtreme was the first clan which said that 12-13 years old guys couldn't be mature at all to join, so that's why we put an age limit (that now doesn't exist anymore), Stewie was 13 and Scarv is 18. In my opinion a 18 years old guy shouldn't act the same way as a 13 years old one. I'm not saying that age is an excuse, what I meant is that Scarv acted exactly the same way as Stewie who is, I repeat, much younger than him.

A few months before he acted like a kid. But that compassion-thing works... but he was already a few times denied as scarv. Now he apped with a wrong name and now you guys forgive him. Stewie did the same but you kicked and banned him after you have found it out. So thinks clearly.

Nice Games

not for me, i play so bad.(at all game i play.)

GG anyway.

Like so many others have said, what you have done is not really different from Stewie. I also didn't like how you lied about who you are and when found out still tried to continue to uphold the lie. Something like this shouldn't be rewarded.

No-vote