Page 5 of 8

Re: .o.

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 3:02 am
by Vash
I want Samo in.

Vote.

Re: .o.

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 3:06 am
by viva
ha!
gj vash wise descision!
c“mon samo!

Re: .o.

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 9:41 am
by Judge
Raksha is inactive, I don't know how Samo will get his last vote...

Re: .o.

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 12:26 pm
by SAMO
Vash wrote:I want Samo in.

Vote.
Thank you very much Vash !
Judge wrote:Raksha is inactive, I don't know how Samo will get his last vote...
I have to wait ^^

Re: .o.

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 12:35 pm
by Pacio
The french noob is near to be Tx, heh? :D
Hasero i didn't expected a no-vote you are the only one who saw samo flaming in last times! :down:
+ Samo was inactive i think, how can he flame if he was inactive!!??!!?!?
Gl Sumohtui!
~ The Italian Douchebag, Pacio!

Re: .o.

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 12:58 pm
by GeniuZ
Srsly, i have never ever seen Samo flaming or stuff... Soz, Hasero, but whuttafuck are you talking about?! That's wack...

Re: .o.

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 1:42 pm
by Pricey
This might sound silly but because theres a lack of generals able to vote and Hasero (WTF MAN) gave a no-vote.. can us normal members join together so 5 of our votes = 1 normal vote.. so he can get in.

Re: .o.

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 2:07 pm
by Lethal
dude hasero wtf r u talkin about? u dont even play so hwo the hell do u even know that he flames?

hes one of the nicer members of this community and he jokes with freinds and stuff but thats it...

i think everyone agrees that that decision was unjustly made

Re: .o.

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 2:32 pm
by Acer
Pricey wrote:This might sound silly but because theres a lack of generals able to vote and Hasero (WTF MAN) gave a no-vote.. can us normal members join together so 5 of our votes = 1 normal vote.. so he can get in.
If my vote counts I give Samo a vote

Re: .o.

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 2:38 pm
by krauser
Stop offending Hasero please... he voted and we have to respect his decision.

There will be always people with different opinions, though I can't understand his decision neither...

At least give him a chance to explain his post.

Plus, I think that we have to find a solution for the "we haven't got enough voters"-thingy.

Re: .o.

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 2:52 pm
by Vash
Don't forget that Storm is able to vote...

Re: .o.

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 3:13 pm
by krauser
Vash wrote:Don't forget that Storm is able to vote...
Storm:

Last visited: 13.11.2009, 22:42

Re: .o.

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 3:15 pm
by GeniuZ
Hmh, if this member-vote thingy is acceptable:

Vote

Re: .o.

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 3:18 pm
by viva
Genius wrote:Hmh, if this member-vote thingy is acceptable:

Vote
YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRR!

Re: .o.

Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 4:34 pm
by Judge
Sounds unfair that when someone doesn't want an app although everyone does, the member cannot join cause of that...