Kelborns APP

[SAMO]

Seems like you're a very talented player!
Unfortunately I couldn't play against you yesterday, ask me today or tomorrow for some 1v1's.

Keep owning meanwhile.

[1eShit]

Looks good so far.
Add me on xfire unless you don't have me on your list.

Good luck.

[Freak]

Lol Insane is still not human.
Screens look good. Good luck with your App.

[Kelborn<]

Hmm i need more Sniper train but oh yea!!! nice match

[GeniuZ]

hey you.

add me on xfire, good luck!

[Kelborn<]

[1eShit]

I forgot to mention above that these 1on1's aren't that good.

You lost really high vs Vicper, well you won vs Vicper too, but not that high, and he isn't as good as e.g. Geniuz, aside from that he was inactive for a month or longer.
Same counts for Atomx & War, War even says he is not good in 1on1's and he won vs you.
Insane is active like one time in 6 months, I didn't play vs him once since I joined TX, and he won 15:5 vs you.

Try to play a 1vs1 against Geniuz.

But I don't know your tactical knowledge, maybe you are way better in scrims/interns, like me.

[1eShit]

Well and I was asked to post this here:

]-TX-[Ironhide: Not winning against War = not good enough, denied
Not winning against Atomx = not good enough, denied

[Madara]

I forgot to mention above that these 1on1's aren't that good.

You lost really high vs Vicper, well you won vs Vicper too, but not that high, and he isn't as good as e.g. Geniuz, aside from that he was inactive for a month or longer.
Same counts for Atomx & War, War even says he is not good in 1on1's and he won vs you.
Insane is active like one time in 6 months, I didn't play vs him once since I joined TX, and he won 15:5 vs you.

Try to play a 1vs1 against Geniuz.

But I don't know your tactical knowledge, maybe you are way better in scrims/interns, like me.

You can't judge the skills of these players in a 1on1's because you never play 1on1's.

[War]

Actually i did not play bad on this 1on1, i was pretty good on the beginning, after i was at my 1on1 level, not that good.
@Shit : Insane is insane in 1on1, he is like the best player on 1on1 if he plays active, he is not playing a lot but well, he is awesome.

Well and I was asked to post this here:

]-TX-[Ironhide: Not winning against War = not good enough, denied
Not winning against Atomx = not good enough, denied

Okay, why not. Then we can (i think) deny a lot of apps... I won against Artist in his app time (I won't do it again now i think) but he is still TX. I can just be in a good day compared to others.

[Judge]

Uh Shit... you're talking about things you don't know.
Insane has always been one of our best 1on1 member, even when he is inactive. Having 5 points out of 15 against Insane is a pretty good result.

Well and I was asked to post this here:

]-TX-[Ironhide: Not winning against War = not good enough, denied
Not winning against Atomx = not good enough, denied

This is false. I assume you have no idea of their skills.

[Irony]

@Kelborn
You should just keep playing 1on1's with the members, no matter if they're "worse" than the best members. If they just know a little about what they're doing they should be able to point some obvious things out that, they might even be having trouble with themselves.

Keep up the good activity, show improvement, and you'll be in sooner rather than later.
Also it might be a good idea if you note the time of your DM's, sometimes that ping bug happens and it's hard to judge a DM without the KPM results. Just note them down when you make the screenshot, and write 'em beneath the screenshots when you post them.

GL

-Irony

[1eShit]

First of all: stop crying.

I did NEVER say that he should be denied.
Before you guys start moaning around, please read properly:

But I don't know your tactical knowledge, maybe you are way better in scrims/interns, like me.

That's what I said.
You know why? Because I suck at 1on1's, and I think if you are a good Team Player it doesn't matter if you suck at 1on1's.
I just said that these 1on1's aren't that good, and I still think so, but it doesn't mean he can't get in.

@ Irony
I wasn't talking about Starzy & you received a PM.


And I don't think that someone, could be pwning really hard if he was inactive for at least 5 months, no matter who it is.

@ Madara

I can anyway.

[Lionheart]

And I don't think that someone, could be pwning really hard if he was inactive for at least 5 months, no matter who it is.

Not true, Insane is the best example: He was and well he will ever be one of the best 1on1 players in the entire RepCom coomunity. Or me, when I became active again, I was better than most of the RRP during my time as an applicant, no matter if here or at RRP. Experience is a huge factor regarding this game, its easy to learn the weapons, you have to know the tactics to be good gamer.

[1eShit]

Well, even if he is, he'd won higher if he was active.
And it actually doesn't improve the other scores.

Why can't someone post critism (= opinion) in an application, without being blamed for it ?
Critism helps ... If everyone would say "wow you're pwning everyone" but he is denied in the end it doesn't help anything.

Another message FROM IRONHIDE (AND NOT ME)

Hidden content:

This is false. I assume you have no idea of their skills.

I'd say I know their skill. And I'd say both of them suck. So if an applicant can not get more than 5 kills against one of the worst members in history of TeamXtreme, how should he be good enough to join? Oh well if people vote for any fucking idiot (like Stewie who even had 3 votes last time) he'll surely get in anyway... Fuck about the skill, it does not matter anyway, eh?

you'd say I should've been denied back when I lost against iStarzy?

No idea what he would say, but I'd agree. Starzy actually sucked.

It's pretty nice that you start out by comparing an applicant to a member and saying that because they lose they're not good enough. How did the other members get in then?

It is not the fact that he lost, it's just against who he lost and with which result! And other members probably got in because they were better. Or do you want to say that Kelborn is the past applicant ever, and if he can not get in, no one can?

Of course only if you hope for the applicant to succeed.

Or you just say the truth, the applicant sucks, and that's it. Might happen as well.

Or me, when I became active again, I was better than most of the RRP during my time as an applicant

Sorry to tell you, but this is TX and not RRP. "Being good in RRP" is about "being average in TX". And I also doubt that you are one of the best 1v1 players...