Signatures

[Firetrap900]

thats quite an awesome signature

[Vash]

Hidden content:

This could be a nice header in high resolution. Nice work!

[Revenge]

Same bg and effects than in one of your sotm sigs.
I guess its the same psd. :D
Nicely worked though.

[Lionheart]

false, both are different ones (:

The C4D came out of the same package, good to see people watch the artworks carefully!

[Graphiix]

false, both are different ones (:

The C4D came out of the same package, good to see people watch the artworks carefully!

To be honest, I`m always surprise about, how good can you be about marying C4d with the render! That`s awesomely nice made! Really great one. But the quality is a bit " blur " I don't know how to describe... :/

EDIT; New one:

[Lionheart]

Check the signature with IE, thats my problem here, mostly all graphics on this baord are presented more "blur" than they actually are, while using firefox of course..

[Graphiix]

Anyway, I liked the font used! Really fits to the signature in my eyes!

Btw, some feedback about my last one ( with the render you fond )

[Lionheart]

ehm, schools blocing your host; try to upload any future signatures with the host I post beyond and I can feedback them!

Hidden content:

www.image-load.net

[Vash]

Check the signature with IE, thats my problem here, mostly all graphics on this baord are presented more "blur" than they actually are, while using firefox of course..

Please read my old post:

HOW THESE FORUMS SHOULDN'T LOOK LIKE:



CORRECT IS:



So who has this problem?

If you have this problem while using Firefox, type in the adress field "about:config" (without quotes) and set "gfx.color_management.mode" to 0.

[Graphiix]

Re-uploaded for Lion

Hidden content:

A new one;

[Lionheart]

Graphixx:
Sig1
#1: way too much light coming from the upper right corner
#2: text is horrible, rather try to involve it more into the signature itself
#3: Whats about this "G"?
#4: the background suits pretty much (if you've used my render..)

Sig2
I aint a fan of car sigs, therefore I can barely judge them. Mostly ppl take a real stock as a background for such signatures, also I would rework the text.


@vash

Hidden content:

Thanks a lot! I tried it, but it has not helped a lot. Im simply using IE while browsing the TX forums (:

[Graphiix]

Graphixx:
Sig1
#1: way too much light coming from the upper right corner
#2: text is horrible, rather try to involve it more into the signature itself
#3: Whats about this "G"?
#4: the background suits pretty much (if you've used my render..)

Sig2
I aint a fan of car sigs, therefore I can barely judge them. Mostly ppl take a real stock as a background for such signatures, also I would rework the text.


@vash

Hidden content:

Thanks a lot! I tried it, but it has not helped a lot. Im simply using IE while browsing the TX forums (:

#1: Was thinking a bit the same
#2: I Still suck about texts... :/
#3: G -> Graphiix. ^^
#4: I don't get the point... :s

I don`t love sig car too, but the car seems me a good one to try something a bit new. Like the smock leaving the exhaust bolt. Some lil things. Wanted to try out to render the image. Btw, the backgroud is made by me ^^

So you don`t like 'em? :(

[Jay]

Hidden content:

c4d mixed with render.

[Graphiix]

What`s the original pictur and the render used?

I fucking like this one, Jay! Your best I think!

[Jay]

The render is from a game called RF online and the c4d was in the Tx pack. :)