Signatures

[Graphiix]

Does she take them with her iPhone?

Is that supposed to be a joke? I personnaly find her photos wonderful.

Nikon D5100.

[Sharp]

Does she take them with her iPhone?

Is that supposed to be a joke? I personnaly find her photos wonderful.

Nikon D5100.

I would have guess so, fooled me though.

[Graphiix]

Does she take them with her iPhone?

Is that supposed to be a joke? I personnaly find her photos wonderful.

Nikon D5100.

I would have guess so, fooled me though.

Why that?

[Penguin]

Does she take them with her iPhone?

Is that supposed to be a joke? I personnaly find her photos wonderful.

Nikon D5100.

DSLR is not a feature in photoshop so I'm sure he didn't apply it to the sig. Next time you post, make it useful please.

[Sharp]

It was a crap joke. In other news, I like the sig, maybe blue the background a tad.

[Penguin]

Ah okay, we only talk about pointless sigs and not real use of media such as photography.

But of course, the capturing of the image USED in the signature, is of course related to the signature because it is an element of it.

useless remark removed

[DC-17]

Please try to not be so retarded next time you post. Thanks.

Please try to be a little bit more respectful in your posts. If you can't then just don't post.


Back to topic (no reply needed)

[Sharp]

Ah okay, we only talk about pointless sigs and not real use of media such as photography.

But of course, the capturing of the image USED in the signature, is of course related to the signature because it is an element of it.

Please try to not be so retarded next time you post. Thanks.

Yes so lets talk about how the image is used in the signature. Not the photographer or her ability with a camera. And of course we are going to be talking about signatures in the Signatures topic. If you would like to show off your photographic talents, feel free to start a topic.

[Penguin]

Okay, but I was talking about the QUALITY of the image (jpg on DSLR, bs quality, grainy at 100% zoom even etc). At no point was I talking about the girl in question.

She might benefit from photography classes, but you my good sir, would benefit from some English classes.

[Sharp]

Okay, but I was talking about the QUALITY of the image (jpg on DSLR, bs quality, grainy at 100% zoom even etc). At no point was I talking about the girl in question.

She might benefit from photography classes, but you my good sir, would benefit from some English classes.

Noted. He's a new one, not to satisfied with the type though.

[Barcode]

Please try to be a little bit more respectful in your posts. If you can't then just don't post.


Back to topic (no reply needed)

She might benefit from photography classes, but you my good sir, would benefit from some English classes.

I feel DC17 was ignored so Just reminding you of what was written 2 posts before.


I tried the Text for that one sharp and it is really hard to do.

[Penguin]

I was the perfect gentleman in my second post, Barkot.

@Sharps sig, second bit of tx doesent read very well for me.

[Sharp]

I was the perfect gentleman in my second post, Barkot.

@Sharps sig, second bit of tx doesent read very well for me.

Better?

[Penguin]

Much.

[SAMO]

this thing annoyes my eyes